Category Archives: real estate investing
Key Reasons To Invest In Real Estate
The global economic recession of 2008 is often linked to the United States housing bubble and subprime mortgages. In the aftermath of the recession, there was much negative sentiment over the real estate sector and few were inclined to consider investments into the sector, in a positive sense.
Tutorial: Exploring Real Estate Investments
However, real estate investment is simply the purchase of a future income stream from property and quite undeserving of the tarnish to its reputation. Here are some of the key reasons to invest in real estate. (For a complete look back at the mortgage meltdown, check out our Investopedia Special Feature – Subprime Mortgages.)
Competitive Risk-Adjusted Returns
Based on data from the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF), private market commercial real estate returned an average of 8.4% over the 10-year period from 2000 to 2010. This credible performance was achieved, together with low volatility relative to equities and bonds, for highly competitive risk-adjusted returns.
Critics would argue that the low volatility characteristic of real estate is the result of infrequent real estate transactions. This means that property values are often determined by third-party appraisals, which tend to lag the market. The infrequent transactions and appraisals result in a smoothing of returns, as reported property values underestimate market values in an upturn and overestimate market values in a downturn.
While it’s true that historic estimates of real estate volatility should be adjusted upward, real time markets are vulnerable to sudden unexpected shocks. A good example of this would be the “Flash Crash” of May 2010, when $1 trillion in stock market value was erased in just 15 minutes. In an environment where market volatility is an issue and the dynamics of algorithmic trading are murky, the more stable pricing of real estate is attractive. (For more, see Did ETFs Cause The Flash Crash?)
| NCREIF U.S. National Property Index Returns |
![]() |
| Source: NCREIF, http://www.ncreif.org/property-index-returns.aspx, 14 July 2011 |
High Tangible Asset Value
Unlike stocks and, to some extent, bonds, an investment in real estate is backed by a high level of brick and mortar. This helps reduce the principal-agent conflict, or the extent to which the interest of the investor is dependent on the integrity and competence of managers and debtors. Even real estate investment trusts (REITs), which are listed real estate securities, often have regulations that mandate a minimum percentage of profits be paid out as dividends.
Attractive and Stable Income Return
A key feature of real estate investment is the significant proportion of total return, accruing from rental income over the long term. Over a 30 year period from 1977 to 2007, close to 80% of total U.S. real estate return was derived from income flows. This helps reduce volatility as investments that rely more on income return, tend to be less volatile than those that rely more on capital value return. (For more, check out Take Advantage Of A Housing Crisis – Rent!)
Real estate is also attractive when compared with more traditional sources of income return. The asset class typically trades at a yield premium to U.S. Treasuries and is especially attractive in an environment where Treasury rates are low.
Portfolio Diversification
Another benefit of investing in real estate is its diversification potential. Real estate has a low, and in some cases, negative, correlation with other major asset classes. This means the addition of real estate to a portfolio of diversified assets can lower portfolio volatility and provide a higher return per unit of risk.
Inflation Hedging
The inflation hedging capability of real estate, stems from the positive relationship between GDP growth and demand for real estate. As economies expand, the demand for real estate drives rents higher and this, in turn, translates into higher capital values. Therefore, real estate tends to maintain the purchasing power of capital, by passing some of the inflationary pressure on to tenants and by incorporating some of the inflationary pressure, in the form of capital appreciation.
The Drawback: Illiquidity
The main drawback of investing in real estate is illiquidity, or the relative difficulty in converting an asset into cash and cash into an asset. Unlike a stock or bond transaction, which can be completed in seconds, a real estate transaction can take months to close. Even with the help of a broker, simply finding the right counterparty can be a few weeks of work.
That said, advances in financial innovation have presented a solution to the issue of illiquidity, in the form of listed REITs and real estate companies. These provide indirect ownership of real estate assets and are structured as listed corporations. They offer better liquidity and market pricing, but come at the price of higher volatility and lower diversification benefits. (Learn more in 20 Investments: Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs).
The Bottom Line
Real estate is a distinct asset class that is simple to understand and can enhance the risk and return profile of an investor’s portfolio. On its own, real estate offers competitive risk-adjusted returns, with less principal-agent conflict and attractive income streams. It can also enhance a portfolio, by lowering volatility through diversification. Though illiquidity can be a concern for some investors, there are ways to gain exposure to real estate, such that illiquidity is reduced, if not brought on-par with that of traditional asset classes.
3 Ways To Value Real Estate Investments
Investing in income-generating real estate involves market data and a degree of subjectivity. One of the most important assumptions that a real estate investor must make when valuing properties is choosing an appropriate capitalization rate, which is the required rate of return on real estate, net of value appreciation or depreciation. Put simply, it is the rate that is applied to net operating income, to determine the present value of a property.
TUTORIAL: Exploring Real Estate Investments
Calculating with Capitalization Rate
For example, if a property that is expected to generate net operating income (NOI) of $1 million over the next 10 years is discounted at a capitalization rate of 14%, the market value of the property would be determined to be $7,142,857 (market value = net operating income / capitalization rate = $1,000,000 / .14). The $7,142,857 market value represents a good deal if the property is selling at $6.5 million and it would be a bad deal if the sale price is $8 million.
Determining the capitalization rate is one of the key metrics in valuing an income-generating property. There are several methods that investors can use to find an appropriate capitalization rate.
Market-Extraction Method
This method assumes that there is current, readily available net operating income and sale price information on comparable income-generating properties. The advantage with the market-extraction method is that the capitalization rate makes the direct income capitalization more meaningful.
Determining the capitalization rate is relatively simple here. Assume an investor is considering buying into a parking lot that is expected to generate $500,000 in net operating income. In the area, there are three existing comparable income generating parking lot properties.
1. Parking lot 1 has a net operating income of $250,000 and a sale price of $3 million. In this case, the capitalization rate is 8.33% ($250,000/$3,000,000).
2. Parking lot 2 has a net operating income of $400,000 and a sale price of $3.95 million. The capitalization rate is 10.13% ($400,000/$3,950,000).
3. Parking lot 3 has a net operating income of $185,000 and a sale price of $2 million. The capitalization rate is 9.25% ($185,000/$2,000,000).
Based on the calculated rates for these three comparable properties (8.33, 10.13 and 9.25%), an overall capitalization rate of 9.4% would be a reasonable representation of the market. Using this capitalization rate, an investor could determine the market value of the property. The parking lot investment opportunity would be valued at $5,319,149 (Market value = Net operating income/overall capitalization rate = $500,000/.094).
Build-up Method
The build-up method is slightly more complex, compared with the market-extraction method. The capitalization rate is achieved by combining interest rate, non-liquidity rate (by which it is illiquid due to the nature of real estate), recapture premium and rate of risk.
Given an interest rate of 4%, a non-liquidity rate of 1.5%, a recapture premium of 1.5% and a rate of risk of 2.5%, the capitalization rate of an equity property would be summed as 11.5% (6+1.5+1.5+2.5). If net operating income was $200,000, the market value of the property would be $1,739,130 ($200,000/.115).
Obviously, performing this calculation is very straightforward. The complexity lies in assessing accurate estimates for the individual components of the capitalization rate, which can be challenging. The advantage of the build-up method is that it attempts to define and accurately measure individual components of a discount rate.
Band-of-Investment Method
The band-of-investment method requires the most advanced calculations of the three methods. The capitalization rate is computed using individual rates of interest for properties that use both debt and equity financing. The advantage of the band-of-investment method is that it is the most appropriate capitalization rate for financed real estate investments.
The first step is to calculate a sinking fund factor. This is the percentage that must be set aside each period to have a certain amount at a future point in time. Assume that a property with net operating income of $950,000 is 50% financed, using debt at 7% interest to be amortized over 15 years. The rest is paid for with equity at a required rate of return of 10%. The sinking fund factor would be calculated as:
Interest rate / 12 months
{[1 + (interest rate / 12 months)]# of years x 12 months}-1
Plugging in the numbers, we get:
.07/12
{[1 + (.07/12)]15×12} – 1
This computes to .003154 per month. Per annum, this percentage equals 0.0378 (.003154 x 12 months). The rate at which a lender must be paid equals this sinking fund factor plus the interest rate. In this example, this rate is 10.78%, or .1078 (.07 + .0378).
Thus, the weighted average rate, or the overall capitalization rate, using the 50% weight for debt and 50% weight for equity is 10.39% ([.5 x .1078] + [.5 x .10]). As a result, the market value of the property would be $9,143,407 ($950,000/.1039).
The Bottom Line
These methods are specifically designed for income-generating properties like apartment houses, commercial and industrial properties. It should be noted that these methods are not appropriate for properties that are occupied by owners. Guessing at the value of an income-generating property can lead to inaccurate assessments and failed investments. Selecting an appropriate capitalization rate increases the precision of an appraisal, and thus, the ability to choose good income-generating property investments.
Multi-Family Dwellings – Your Road to Instant Wealth
If you are ready to make the same journey I have to total financial independence then what you really need is to take a step back and think big, you will then find the rest tends to follow
![]()
by David Lindahl
It’s a fact that those who travel down the real estate investor path have one ultimate aim in mind: total financial independence. But while this is the common uniting thread in the way they do pretty much anything, different real estate investors have different ideas about how to get there. This is why many tend to either take a really long time to get rich, or simply stop as they are getting there because the going is too tough.
As a real estate investor who has become rich by practicing what he preaches, I can both understand the problems involved and the mental set that causes them. Investors of any kind are naturally cautious and quite rightly so and real estate investors are even more cautious than the rest.
Over the course of my career, as I chased my target, I invested in both single and multi-family dwellings, looking at holding a diversified portfolio that included homes as well as apartments. This strategy has given me almost a unique perspective in the real estate industry as I was ideally situated to make direct comparisons between the two and see which one works best.
Now I now that most people reading this will be in one of two camps and will want me to pronounce for one or the other but, realistically, that’s not how real estate investing works.
Certainly, in the journey towards my target, multi-family dwellings made more sense. They made it easy to spread the risks of unoccupied properties, provided liquidity when I needed it and allowed me to have what every investor loves most: a breathing space which provided peace of mind when things got tough.
I have, as you can imagine, bought houses, flipped them quickly and used the money to buy apartments but I have also held onto single-family properties when it made good sense. The obstacles that most real estate investors put in place when they consider which path to take in their careers come from false perceptions and they can easily be dispelled.
A lot, for instance, think that getting into apartments means a lot of trouble with tenants and running different blocks. In inclement weather, you have to make sure the sidewalks and driveways are clear of ice & snow. You have to make sure water isn’t getting into the building, a serious potential for mold growth, and proper ventilation in the summer to make sure that the air circulates evenly.
As the owner of over seven thousand apartments in more states than I care to remember I can say that none of this needs to happen to you. I outsource all the hard work, getting competitive bids from specialist companies because I can offer economies of scale and a growing opportunity to do more business as my portfolio of apartments grows and expands.
This means I can get a better deal in caretaking and even repairs and I do not have to talk to or see a single tenant. If you are ready to make the same journey I have to total financial independence then what you really need is to take a step back and think big, you will then find the rest tends to follow.
Finding a Top Real Estate CPA! Do you need one?
When doing an interview with a prospective CPA, test their real estate tax law knowledge by asking the right questions
![]()
by Albert Aiello
It is a plain old fact that most CPA’s (and I mean most) know little or nothing about real estate investing and consequently do not know the many great tax-saving gems that real estate is the best at offering, where you can legally pay little or no taxes even with a large amount of income.
My students often ask me to refer them a top CPA who knows my Renaissance Goldmine strategies. Now sometimes I get the word “inexpensive’. Sorry, no top CPA is going to be cheap. Remember value first, price second. Another word I often hear is “local”. My response to this,
Do NOT limit yourself to someone local – A frequent BIG mistake, especially with expert-specialists. If you get that right CPA (local or not) who is highly competent, concerned about you, dependable, professional, not a rip off > GRAB them while they are still accessible! With today’s technology, don’t let physical distance get in the way of money-saving advice!!
When doing a phone interview with a prospective CPA, test their real estate tax law knowledge by asking the right questions. For example, if you are selling a property at profit, ask the prospect, “what is a good way to avoid the capital gains taxes?” If they do not say right off the bat, a “1031 exchange”, forget about them. Or if you are a rental property owner and want more deductions, if the prospect does not say “Componentizing” (“Cost Seg Analysis”) or at least something, again forget about them.
Another money-saving idea – Use a qualified bookkeeper to save time & money – A good bookkeeper can do much of the work a CPA does, but at much lower fees and they can be local. You can use them with no CPA or use the CPA only on an as-needed basis.
Investors’ Best Kept Secret – multi-part Report
There are hundreds of thousands of real estate investors in this country. And the numbers continue to swell, largely because it’s a proven fact that investing in real estate has created more millionaires than any other form of investing! Geez, knowing that little fact… who wouldn’t want to be a real estate investor?
Of course, there’s always “the other side of the coin.” Truth is, 85% of those who call themselves a real estate investor never buy their first house!
These facts quickly lead us to the obvious question. Why? We think it’s simple… most investors never get past the first hurdle… finding a predictable, consistent and reliable source of leads to motivated sellers who are desperate to sell their homes!
As investors, we can’t afford to pay “owner-occupant” prices. We have to find motivated sellers who are willing to sell their homes for significantly less than the retail value.
There must be enough of a “cushion” so we have room for cash flow on a rental or lease option property, retail profit on a fixer-upper, or wholesale profit on a quick-turn deal.
These challenges were exactly what we were facing every day of our investing business. We were pursuing every avenue we could think of to find good deals on a consistent basis. Many ways worked, but they were never consistent. Therefore, they weren’t creating the kind of income that we could rely on. And that was problematic because we really like consistent income. You?
Then we literally stumbled into a wholesale deal that gave us a “net” profit of $55,000… yes, I said wholesale deal! And yes, I said $55,000 profit! I was in the house twice and my business partner was only in the house one time. How cool is that?
Potentially more exciting than the $55,000 of cold, hard cash in our bank accounts was that we believed there were many more homeowners just like the one we had freed from foreclosure! I bet you would have examined the heck out of that deal to figure how to find more like it, too. Right?
Well, that’s exactly what we did and we found an untapped market niche of highly motivated sellers that all the other investors were intentionally avoiding!!
Needless to say, we were “dancing in the streets” excited!
The niche we found was the “troubled bankruptcy” market.
The homeowner (Jessica) that we “saved” from her foreclosure nightmare had been in bankruptcy just prior to us “stumbling” into her living room. Jessica couldn’t meet all the responsibilities that the bankruptcy court imposed, so she was unceremoniously “kicked out” of bankruptcy. And when that happened, the bank came running after her house again… foreclosure was looming large and in her state of Georgia, the process only took 35 days. Needless to say, she was more than a little thankful that we came to the rescue!
As we learned more about Jessica’s situation and the details surrounding a typical bankruptcy, we started to define this “troubled bankruptcy” market.
Let us be perfectly clear… we do not advocate marketing to people who have just filed bankruptcy, whether it’s a Chapter 7 or a Chapter 13 (the two types of personal bankruptcies). Why? First of all, because not everyone in bankruptcy is a homeowner so you would just be throwing away thousands of dollars with your marketing campaign. Secondly, if someone in bankruptcy is meeting all the requirements imposed on them by the bankruptcy court, they are totally NOT motivated to sell because they are enjoying the protection of the court. In short, as long as they meet the bankruptcy court requirements, all other legal actions against them stop! Most importantly from our perspective, their bank can’t foreclose on their home so there is zero motivation for them to sell… at least not at an “investor” price.
HOWEVER, what we do advocate is marketing to: (1) homeowners, (2) in bankruptcy, (3) who are unable to fulfill their responsibilities to the bankruptcy court.
This is our target market… for the simple reason that at least 95% of the time, these homeowners will soon get kicked out of bankruptcy. And when that happens, their mortgage company will move quickly toward foreclosure. Again, this is the ideal time for us, as investors, to insert ourselves into the lives of these homeowners and offer our assistance as buyers.
Are you starting to see why these homeowners are highly motivated to sell? They’ve been through it all… they were unable to make their payments, then perhaps they were facing foreclosure, then they filed bankruptcy to stop the foreclosure, and now they’re losing their bankruptcy protection. So they realize that foreclosure is coming again.
Clearly, YES, they are extremely motivated to sell so they can get this emotional and stressful time in their lives behind them!
Updated 13 Shortsale Property Package ~Great Income Producers
I just got some hot deals and I wanted to let you know as soon as possible I’ll get these properties or available find some other investors and go in and take all these properties of my hands. Check out these numbers subtract the renovation figures if you can do better. But you can’t beat these numbers. Drive by take a look at it, and submit your offers.
4090 Old Spanish Trail, Boynton, FL
$49,900
3 Bed, 1.5 Bath Home
Potential Rental Income $1,000 month
Currently Vacant
| Sales Price | $59,900.00 |
| Taxes | $1,000.00 |
| Insurance | $1,500.00 |
| Management Fee | $1,200.00 |
| Maintenance | $1,200.00 |
| Utilities | $0.00 |
| HOA | $0.00 |
| Vacancy | $600.00 |
| Total Expense | $5,500.00 |
| Rental Income | $12,000.00 |
| NOI | $6,500.00 |
| Net Yield | 10.85% |
| Gross NOI | 20.03% |
All figures approximate. Great house in good area with central a/c. Price includes $10,000 renovation credit.
1377 7th Street, West Palm Beach, FL
$39,500
3 Bed, 1 Bath Home
Potential Rental Income $1,000 month
| Sales Price | $58,000.00 |
| Taxes | $1,430.00 |
| Insurance | $1,500.00 |
| Management Fee | $1,200.00 |
| Maintenance | $1,200.00 |
| Utilities | $0.00 |
| HOA | $0.00 |
| Vacancy | $600.00 |
| Total Expense | $5,930.00 |
| Rental Income | $12,000.00 |
| NOI | $6,070.00 |
| Net Yield | 10.47% |
| Gross NOI | 20.69% |
All figures approximate. Price includes $10,000 renovation credit.
1441 8th Street, West Palm Beach, FL
$39,500
3 Bed, 1 Bath Home
Potential Rental Income $1,000 month
Currently Vacant
|
Sales Price |
$58,000.00 |
|
Taxes |
$1,501.00 |
|
Insurance |
$1,500.00 |
|
Management Fee |
$1,200.00 |
|
Maintenance |
$1,200.00 |
|
Utilities |
$0.00 |
|
HOA |
$0.00 |
|
Vacancy |
$600.00 |
|
Total Expense |
$6,001.00 |
|
Rental Income |
$12,000.00 |
|
NOI |
$5,999.00 |
|
Net Yield |
10.34% |
|
Gross NOI |
20.69% |
All figures approximate. Price includes $15,000 renovation credit
619 8th Street, West Palm Beach, FL
$259,000
2 Bed, 1 Bath Home
10 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
2 Bedroom, 1 Bathroom Units
Potential Rental Income $7,500 month
Currently Vacant
|
Sales Price |
$349,900.00 |
|
Taxes |
$3,000.00 |
|
Insurance |
$3,000.00 |
|
Management Fee |
$9,000.00 |
|
Maintenance |
$9,000.00 |
|
Utilities |
$0.00 |
|
HOA |
$0.00 |
|
Vacancy |
$4,500.00 |
|
Total Expense |
$28,500.00 |
|
Rental Income |
$90,000.00 |
|
NOI |
$61,500.00 |
|
Net Yield |
17.58% |
|
Gross NOI |
25.72% |
All figures approximate. Price includes renovation credit.
1621 Tropical Drivee, Lake Worth, FL
$35,000
2 Bed, 1 Bath Home
Potential Rental Income $850 month
Currently Vacant
|
Sales Price |
$39,900.00 |
|
Taxes |
$1,137.00 |
|
Insurance |
$1,500.00 |
|
Management Fee |
$1,200.00 |
|
Maintenance |
$1,020.00 |
|
Utilities |
$0.00 |
|
HOA |
$0.00 |
|
Vacancy |
$510.00 |
|
Total Expense |
$5,36700 |
|
Rental Income |
$10,200.00 |
|
NOI |
$4,833.00 |
|
Net Yield |
12.11% |
|
Gross NOI |
25.55% |
All figures approximate.
619 59th Street, West Palm Beach, FL
$39,900
2 Bed, 2 Bath Home
Potential Rental Income $900 month
Currently Vacant
|
Sales Price |
$42,000.00 |
|
Taxes |
$1,305.00 |
|
Insurance |
$1,500.00 |
|
Management Fee |
$1,200.00 |
|
Maintenance |
$1,080.00 |
|
Utilities |
$0.00 |
|
HOA |
$0.00 |
|
Vacancy |
$540.00 |
|
Total Expense |
$5,625.00 |
|
Rental Income |
$10,800.00 |
|
NOI |
$5,175.00 |
|
Net Yield |
12.32% |
|
Gross NOI |
25.71% |
All figures approximate. Solid home in good rental area with central a/c. Price includes $10,000 renovation credit.
254 Lytton Court, West Palm Beach, FL
$79,900
3 Bed, 2 Bath Home
Potential Rental Income $2,000 month
Currently Vacant
|
Sales Price |
$115,000.00 |
|
Taxes |
$3,000.00 |
|
Insurance |
$1,700.00 |
|
Management Fee |
$2,400.00 |
|
Maintenance |
$2,400.00 |
|
Utilities |
$0.00 |
|
HOA |
$0.00 |
|
Vacancy |
$1,200.00 |
|
Total Expense |
$10,700.00 |
|
Rental Income |
$24,000.00 |
|
NOI |
$13,300.00 |
|
Net Yield |
11.57% |
|
Gross NOI |
20.87% |
All figures approximate. Home with cottage in Historic area of WPB. Price includes $XXX renovation credit.
5344 Bosque Lane, #104, WPB
$39,900
2 Bed, 1 Bath Home
Potential Rental Income $900 month
Currently Vacant
|
Sales Price |
$42,000.00 |
|
Taxes |
$200.00 |
|
Insurance |
$0.00 |
|
Management Fee |
$1,200.00 |
|
Maintenance |
$1,080.00 |
|
Utilities |
$0.00 |
|
HOA |
$3,120.00 |
|
Vacancy |
$540.00 |
|
Total Expense |
$6,140.00 |
|
Rental Income |
$10,800.00 |
|
NOI |
$4,660.00 |
|
Net Yield |
11.10% |
|
Gross NOI |
25.71% |
All figures approximate. Beautifully renovated townhome in desirable rental/owner area. Price includes $2,000 renovation credit.
3850 Orange Street, Lantana, FL.
$45,000
3 Bed, 1 Bath Home
Current Rental Income $900 month
Currently Occupied
|
Sales Price |
$59,000.00 |
|
Taxes |
$863.00 |
|
Insurance |
$1,500.00 |
|
Management Fee |
$1,200.00 |
|
Maintenance |
$1,080.00 |
|
Utilities |
$0.00 |
|
HOA |
$0.00 |
|
Vacancy |
$0.00 |
|
Total Expense |
$4,643.00 |
|
Rental Income |
$10,800.00 |
|
NOI |
$6,157.00 |
|
Net Yield |
10.44% |
|
Gross NOI |
18.31% |
All figures approximate. Price includes $6,150 renovation credit.
4001 San Castle Blvd. Lantana, FL
$39,900
3 Bed, 2 Bath Home
Potential Rental Income $1,000 month
Currently Vacant
|
Taxes |
$808.00 |
|
Insurance |
$1,500.00 |
|
Management Fee |
$1,200.00 |
|
Maintenance |
$1,200.00 |
|
Utilities |
$0.00 |
|
HOA |
$0.00 |
|
Vacancy |
$600.00 |
|
Total Expense |
$5,308.00 |
|
Rental Income |
$12,000.00 |
|
NOI |
$6,692.00 |
|
Net Yield |
11.17% |
|
Gross NOI |
20.03% |
All figures approximate. Great house in good area on huge corner lot. Price includes $15,000 renovation credit.
125 South F Street, Lake Worth, FL
$97,700
DUPLEX – 2 Apartments
Current Rental Income $1,650 month
Currently Occupied
|
Sales Price |
$97,700.00 |
|
Taxes |
$2,033.00 |
|
Insurance |
$1,650.00 |
|
Management Fee |
$1,980.00 |
|
Maintenance |
$2,040.00 |
|
Utilities |
$0.00 |
|
HOA |
$0.00 |
|
Vacancy |
$0.00 |
|
Total Expense |
$7,703.00 |
|
Rental Income |
$20,400.00 |
|
NOI |
$12,697.00 |
|
Net Yield |
13.00% |
|
Gross NOI |
20.88% |
All figures approximate. CBS Duplex: 2/1 & 1/1. Needs less than $2K in light repairs/paint
Tenants pay own utilities; owner pays lawn.
510 South F Street, Lake Worth, FL
$77,000
TRIPLEX – 3 Apartments
Potential Rental Income $2,000 month
Currently Vacant
|
Sales Price |
$129,900.00 |
|
Taxes |
$2,940.00 |
|
Insurance |
$1,900.00 |
|
Management Fee |
$1,200.00 |
|
Maintenance |
$2,400.00 |
|
Utilities |
$0.00 |
|
HOA |
$0.00 |
|
Vacancy |
$1,200.00 |
|
Total Expense |
$9,640.00 |
|
Rental Income |
$24,000.00 |
|
NOI |
$14,360.00 |
|
Net Yield |
11.05% |
|
Gross NOI |
18.48% |
All figures approximate. CBS Triplex 2/1, 1/1 & 1/1. Price includes $32,000 renovation credit
For more information about this property and others like this one visit www.southfloridareinvestments.com
Cash or Hard Money
561.670.3297
edays@rocketmail.com













